The criminal court of Saint-Martin examined Thursday, March 21, the last part of the affair of the Frenet school. The leaders, the Héritier spouses, were sentenced on February 21 (and have appealed since) to fines and banned exercise for, among other things, embezzlement of public money.
They were notably prosecuted for having falsified information (address and duration of professional inactivity) with the complicity of a Pôle Emploi agent, in order to bring their employees, including their two children, into the eligibility criteria for CUI subsidized contracts. And to have thus diverted for their profit 97 euros. The state, through the service and payment agency, supported up to 000% of the teachers' salaries at the school. The Pôle Emploi agent Marika Andriulli, whose case had been disjoined, was also prosecuted for the same fraud, as well as forgery and forgery. She was summoned Thursday before the criminal court of Saint-Martin. The Pôle Emploi advisor was accused of having, in the context of her work, entered false addresses by computer in priority neighborhoods, and / or of having lengthened the duration of professional inactivity of employees so that application files for subsidized contracts are validated. According to her, the address and the duration of the professional inactivity are declarative data and she therefore listened to what Mr. Heritier said to him who introduced himself as the president of the Frenet school association. She explains that she was overwhelmed with work at the time, that she was also pressured by results and recognized mistakes and a lack of vigilance. While the Héritier family's defense on this aspect was to instruct the Pôle Emploi counselor who ultimately had control over the data that she entered by computer, Marika Andriulli's lawyer presented her as the “victim of the maneuvers of a family of notorious crooks ”. In addition to the negligence of her client, she pleads the agency's dysfunctions and the responsibility of her superiors. Finally, the defense lawyer emphasizes that Marika Andriulli did not benefit from these subsidized contracts and requests his release.
For the prosecution, the employer cannot go behind each of its agents and the material elements do not fall under "nonsense or errors". "It is the responsibility of the Pôle Emploi agent who must make minimal checks" advances the vice-prosecutor who requires a fine of 5 euros including 000 suspended and a ban on employment in the public service or in an association which has a public service mission. The matter was put under advisement on May 3000.
(More details on www.soualigapost.com)
6,081 total views
No comments